Elon Musk’s Tesla has dropped a 30 -minute video designed to electrify fans and stir the debate. Posted on 28 June, the clip shows that Musk’s claim is a historic milestone: the first Tesla model Y factory to the customer home, without any person and without remote operations.

“A customer from the highways was completed a day before the schedule, including the first fully autonomous distribution of a Tesla model Y from the factory for the house !!” Musk posted on X (East Twitter) on 27 June.

The model Y, the world’s best -selling vehicle, navigates on parking lots, highways, intersections and city streets after traffic signals and stops for pedestrians. Destination? A very happy owner’s house at a distance of about 30 minutes from Tesla’s Austin Gigafectory.

Hang out with US and model Y for 30 minutes

Full drive in 1x speed below https://t.co/LCCLC85HSN pic.twitter.com/3ki7styhsa

– Tesla (@Tesla) June 28, 2025

Musk did not put back: “There were no people in the car and there were no distance operators in control of any point. Completely autonomous!” He continued: “To do the best of our knowledge, this is the first completely autonomous drive in which there are no people in the car or operate the car on a public highway from a distance.”

There were no people in the car and there were no distance operators under control of any point. Completely autonomous!

To do the best of our knowledge, this is the first completely autonomous drive in which there are no people in the car or operate the car on a public highway from a distance.

– Elon Musk (@elonmusk) 27 June, 2025

The fans on X were ecstasy. “Thanks for changing the world and how we work” a written.

Thanks for changing the world and how we work – really unprecedented to witness history. Just curious: If Tesla now has a technique where a car can completely drive a customer’s house (even on highways) across the city from the factory, can you help us …

– Aiagent (@ai_voiceagent) 27 June, 2025

“Fantastic to see this,” said another.

It is fantastic to see the fantastic and shy from the 5th anniversary of Giga Texas’s beginning! Historical!

– Joe TEGTMEYER 🚀 🤠🛸😎 (@Joetegtmeyer) 27 June, 2025

This is the kind of video that believes you that the future has finally come. But it is Elon Musk and Tesla, about which we are talking about-a company with a high-vapor and long history of under-daily technology. To understand what is really happening, you need to understand the race of high-domination, multi-dowry-dollar to make a really autonomous car.

The Tech Wars: Camera vs Laser

There are two fundamental visions in the heart of self-driving race.

On one side, you have Tesla. Its “full self-driving” (FSD) system depends almost especially on cameras and AI. The approach known as the “Tesla Vision” argues that if man can just drive with two eyes, a car should be able to do so with eight cameras that provide a 360 degree scene. The car’s computer “sees” the world and decides on a large amount of video data, on which it is trained. This is a blind impressive and low -cost approach, as it avoids expensive hardware.

On the other hand, you have companies such as Wemo (the original company of Google, owned by the alphabet). The system of Wemo also uses cameras and radar, but its major sensor is lidar (light detection and range). Lidar units revolve around, shooting millions of laser beams per second to create a car’s hyper-unique, real-time 3D map of the car’s surroundings. This gives the car a supernatural ability to “see” the exact expansion, distance, shapes and objects with day or night. It is more expensive, but widely considered a stronger and fruitless system by many in the industry.

The stakes are collors: the company that really crack, level 5 autonomy – where a car can drive itself anywhere, anytime, without any human intervention – not only will dominate the auto industry, but will also bring revolution in logistics, transport and urban life.

Reality Checks: Dicksticking Publicity

With that background, let’s see Tesla’s video again. The model Y impressively handles various real -world scenarios. But before Kasturi, a historical claim, characterlessly, exaggerated. A few days ago, on 22 June, Tesla Launched A very limited version of its robotaxi service in Austin. Not only did it consist of a small number of car and hand -chosen customers, but every vehicle had a human observer on the passenger seat and limited to a “geophand” (geographically limited) area.

Furthermore, Musk claims that it is “the first completely autonomous drive with no people in the car … a public highway” is protesting “. The Wemo already offers a driverless ride that includes a highway trip for its employees in Phoenix, San Francisco and Los Angeles. While not yet available to the public, the capacity is on for some time. The significant difference is that WayMo has spent years to recognize data and validate its safety in these areas with its Lidar-equipped fleet, while the Tesla is running to create a public perception of leadership.

We take us: a success or a carefully choreographed stunt?

This Tesla video is a PR win. But given the track record of Musk, there is a healthy dose of suspicion. It is highly likely that this specific 30-minute passage was carefully mapped and tested by Tesla in ideal conditions to ensure an innocent performance for the video. The actual test of autonomy is not that a car can complete a full, pre -planned journey; It is whether it can handle thousands of unexpected trips, safely, more than millions of miles.

The most described question remains: if Tesla’s system is actually “completely autonomous” as claimed in this video, then why does its commercial robotaxis still need a human observer?

Musk is a great salesman, and this video is his latest, most compelling advertisement. It sells a vision of the future which is a tantalizali pass. But as we have seen repeatedly, with Tesla, a promotional video and the gap between the everyday reality can be huge. As long as these cars are navigating countless cities without human safety nets, this “historic” is a luxurious, but potentially brittle, slightly greater than the piece of marketing.