The government is to release more information about the concessions made on the proposed welfare changes, as the ministers attempts to rebel the labor MPs.

Work and Pension Secretary Liz Kendal said that the government is aiming to give a “fair, more kind” profit system ahead of its reforms on Tuesday.

Last week, the Prime Minister Sir Kir Stmper was forced into a U-turn to overcome their changes in their benefits after threatening to vote for more than 120 Labor MPs.

The deal with rebel MPs suggests that welfare reforms would only save £ 2BN in a year, rather than £ 5BN expected to save them by 2030.

The conservatives said that the ministers have ruined the opportunity to improve welfare and called for a cut in mental health benefits for all, but in the worst cases.

Original welfare reform bill Proposals include restricting eligibility for personal freedom payment (PIP) and cutting the element related to the health of universal credit.

But an amendment that would have stopped the bill on its first barrier was signed by 126 labor backbenchers who argued that the plans were made early and pushed weak disabled people into poverty.

When it became clear that the bill would fall, the Prime Minister offered the MPs to rebel concessions – which includes limiting of pips to only new contenders.

The government also reversed its plans to free the health related to the health of the universal credit, and the payment will now grow in line with inflation for the existing recipients.

The minister will underline the terms of reviewing PIP evaluation, under the leadership of Disabled Minister Sir Stephen Tims in collaboration with people with disabilities.

Those rules that will implement rights for health and disability benefits people will try to work without any assurance, they will also be kept in Parliament.

But dozens of labor MPs still have a misunderstanding about changes in benefits and may defy the government in Tuesday’s vote.

Labor MP Clive Epord, for Eltham and Chisleharst since 1997, told the BBC that he would still oppose the government’s welfare schemes despite important concessions.

Asked if he has changed his mind, he said: “No, I am afraid.

“There is still a savings of £ 3.5bn which are necessary in these measures and we do not yet know the effect of poverty that they will have.”

Epord said he felt that many of his workers’ colleagues were waiting to hear what the government is saying today “and how the revised proposals would affect the beneficiaries.

He said: “As long as we know and do not understand the effect on them, we should not take what I see as a jump in the dark.”

Efforts continued through weekends to talk to Labor MPs about the change, and Kendall would be expected to assure those who are called Universal Credit and Personal Freeding Payment Bills before Tuesday’s vote and still on second reading of the new law.

Kendal said: “We should build a welfare system that provides protection for those who cannot work and the correct support for those who can do.

“Very often, people with disabilities feel stuck, worried that if they try to work, they can lose the support on which they depend on.

“That’s why we are taking action to overcome those obstacles, support disabled people to live with dignity and freedom, and open passage for those who want to pursue it.”

Liberal Democrats are planning to vote against the bill and have called people from the government to bring their programs forward to help people in work more quickly.

Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper said: “Liberal Democrats cannot only support any measures that make things difficult for unpaid carers, disabled people who rely on support with daily tasks to live on employment, and whose disability means they will never work.”

Ministers hope that their improvement benefits will promote employment among recipients, at a time when 2.8 million people are financially passive due to long -term illness.

If nothing changes, the health and disability profit bill is estimated to reach £ 70BN in a year by the end of the bill, a level of the government’s expenses states that “unstable” is “unstable”.