Philippines Gambling is done through all stages of regulation. Opponents are flying around with the country, which still do not agree on a best course of action. However, more practical MPs have called for one Rather moderate approach Compared to some extreme proposals introduced in the previous weeks.

Will be present with gambling or without restrictions

One of the popular talk points is Complete ban on online gamblingSomething that is representative. Joseph Bernos The lump sum has been opposed, arguing that there were historical evidence to suggest that a lump sum restriction on gambling is so much that the black market should be empowered that does not matter.

“History has shown us that it does not disappear by banning a popular but controversial activity; it only runs it in shade, where there is no inspection, no accountability and more threat to our people., Bernos said.

He called for fellow MPs and government officials to be realistic and accept the simple truth that adults enjoy the online game and that those games will continue to exist and even if the country will have to try and exclude them.

“There is a demand for opportunity online game, especially among adults. If we ban legitimate platforms,, he explained.

Let’s be realistic, urge the law maker

According to Bernos, the main issue does not exist in regulated gambling platforms, but in their poor inspection, which can be dramatically improved to ensure that consumers are safe and black-marketers are placed in the bay.

The legalist believes that the gambling sector is responsible for generating jobs, supporting technical infrastructure and promoting national income as tax revenue.

Other, more practical suggestions have mentioned limited advertisements, some of which are already being implemented. Specific deposit and Betting limit It is also floated as an idea that can help consumers to mold gambling.