Tony Tan is a alphabet stockholder, which a little concerned him that the company’s Google subsidiary may have potentially left for billions of dollars in civilian punishment. Other technical firms including Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, T MobileOracle, and LG, are also potentially on the hook. To understand what happened, we have to go back to January 20, the second time Donald Trump was inaugurated.
In April 2024, the then President Joe Biden was correct against a time limit due to the bill signed in the law. The bill gave the owner of Tikokkok 270 days to sell the app for 270 days or Tiktok was banned in US President Trump, Trump signed an executive order and expanded the April 5 deadline. And when the deadline and the results failed to result in the sale of the app, Trump extended his executive orders with the previous one, holding hands on the tiktok by 17 September, 2025.
The next day of the first expansion of Trump’s executive order, on 5 April, the administration sent letters to technical companies, including Apple, in which they were told that even though the law otherwise said, they would not face any result from keeping Tiktok online. The original law signed by President Biden said that Any company that helps Tiktok continues to work in violation of law in America, faces up to $ 850 billion in liabilityAnd since the executive order did not make Tiktok legal in the US, Google Stockholder Mr. Tan has some concerns.
“Neither you nor former President Joe Biden chose to trigger the 90-day expansion of the deadline in the law. Instead, in an executive order, you instructed the Department of Justice not to implement the law for 75 days. This non-reflection of Tiktok Ban was not only disorganized, but also applied serious questions about the future of Tiktok, but also applied the law, because the law used, because the law used the law. Goes, because the law is used. Continuous operations of Ticketkok in the United States, such as Oracle Ticketk and Apple and Google to provide cloud computing services to your respective app store “
Senator Edward Marki, Senator Corey Booker, and President Trump written by Senator Chris Van Hollen -Lator
As a result of Google’s belonging to Ticketkok at Play Store, Mr. Tan sued Google’s original company, Google’s original company, to find out why he returned Tiktok to Play Store, seeing that it could face a liability as a $ 850 billion to the company. He says that the alphabet’s decision can affect all its shareholders.
Washington, DC 20530
April 5, 2025
Catherine adams
Senior vice president and general consultant
Apple Inc.
N o’lary
Ian Garsengorn
Enforcement of Americans protected by re -ex -foreign controlled application act
Dear Ms. Adams:
Article II of the United States Constitution has the responsibility of national security and foreign policy operations in the President. The President had earlier determined that a sudden closed shutdown of the Tiatok platform for the National Security and Foreign Affairs of the United States would interfere with the execution of the constitutional duties of the President. See Executive Order 14166 (EO 14166). The Attorney General has concluded that Americans who protect from the anti -foreign controlled application Act (“Act”) are properly read for not violating such Chief President National Security and Foreign Affairs forces.
Executive Order 14166 directed the Department of Justice not to take any action from the United States, which to implement the Act to implement the Act for any conduct through January 19, 2025 to April 5, 2025 (“cover period”). According to the responsibility of the President to protect national security and conduct foreign policy, the President determined that the 75-day expansion of the cover period by June 19, 2025 is appropriate and signed a later executive order to influence that determination (“extended cover period”). See Executive Order, Extension of Tiktok Enforcement delay (April 4, 2025).
In the Executive Order signed on 4 April, the President directed the “Attorney General to issue a letter to each provider, stating that there is no violation of the law and that there is no liability for any conduct that has been for any conduct from the effective date of the extended cover period. The facts and the circumstances based on the Accession General, on the basis of the review of the Attorney General, the Apple INC. Not violated and apple incovered under the act covered during the Cover period.
The Department of Justice is also abandoning any claim, the United States of America Apple Inc. During the period covered, the Act may have been prosecuted for the conduct and in relation to the application covered under the Act, in relation to the large family of Tikokkok and Bidens Limited and Tikok, Inc. All this is taken from the Planery Authority of the Attorney General on litigation, citizens and criminals, with the United States, its agencies, or departments, parties, as well as to enter the settlements to limit the future practice of the executive branch discretion to the Attorney General’s authority.
In the end, because the ACT only contains the authority for investigation and enforcement of the Act in the Attorney General, the Department of Justice has intended to take all necessary action to implement the Executive Orders of the President and to implement the AMICS briefs, interest statements, or to intervene to implement the Act to the Attorney General’s Exclusive Authority.
Respect,
Pamela Bandi
Mentorist
United States Department of Justice
