Doctors are killing thousands of people in a year for nothing or doing stroke? How do doctors celebrate patients to sign up for those procedures that are risky without all benefits?
There are millions Earning Stent for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), yet we now know that angioplasty and stent placement is not really prevent Heart attack, long -term angina provides relief from pain, or improves survival for such patients. Why? Because the most dangerous plaques – “weakest” Breakage Or erosion – later leading to cardiac event ”(a heart attack), not those who do not put in the stent. They are not even those who are often seen to obstruct blood flow on the angiogram. Therefore,” We need to avoid ‘medical confusion’ that we are shown more than the evidence. “Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) looks great.
We are not just talking about billions of dollars. Stent placement and blood-thin drugs need to be taken Reason Complications, including heart failure, stroke and death, are relatively low. There Is Less than 1 percent of the chance PCI will kill us or throw us out, and the 15 percent risk of heart attack is only when our stent shut down at a later date, which only Happens About 1 percent in near period. There Is 13 percent of the renal injury, however, due to the colors that are to be injected, but it usually Healing On his own. The most serious complications like death, Happen Only 1 of the 150 cases should be multiplied by hundreds of thousands of processes every year.
In an emergency setting, as you are actively having a heart attack, angioplasty can be a lifetime, but these hundreds of thousands of processes are done for stable coronary artery disease, for which no benefit is visible. Therefore, doctors are killing or killing thousands of people in a year for nothing. And that’s not either Counting Thousands of silent mini-stroke tens that can contribute to cognitive decline due to these processes. 11 and 17 percent of people who undergo angioplasty or stent come up with new brain lesions, as you can see down in my video and at 2:16 Risk of heart stentIt is up to one of the six persons.
How do doctors do Persuade Patients sign up to PCI when it does not reduce the risk of death or heart attack, nor does it offer long -term symptoms relief? Apparently, “easily fail to inform the patient that PCI will not reduce its risk of death or MI [myocardial infarction or heart attack]Or that the symptom has gone after 5 years, ”long -term symptoms are not offered relief.
Cardiologists are aware of how little they help, but studies have “consistently performed” that patients feel that stent will reduce their risk of heart attack or death. More than 70 percent patients incorrectly It is believed that This stent will expand their life expectancy or stop the future heart attack. So it was studied – Shape “Why patients reduce these benefits.” Where are they getting these wild ideas? The answer is that many patients are being kept in darkness. Doctors, who reduce the benefits and understand risks, can pressurize patients on procedures that will not benefit them in the way they think they will do. Why? Well, doctors can be paid per procedure for one thing. “Current reimbursement advocates procedures on medicine and lifestyle changes, and it is possible that reimbursement may affect the recommendations of physicians.” Normal knowledge is paid more to offer stents to doctors than recommending changes in diet and lifestyle.
Stagnant coronary Saying wrong Of benefits. In conversations recorded between cardiologists and their patients, only two discussions included all the seven elements informed in two discussions.-The problem has an option, explaining the problem, discussing options and professionals and oppositions, discussing patients, informing the process, informing the process, asking whether they understand what they have, and they want to do what they want. Only 3 percent These basic elements were also killed in the doctors and dialogue about the stent. And this was the case when “doctors and patients knew that they were being recorded, which could affect their behavior. If so, it is likely that it represents a best case landscape for these physicians.” Only 3 percent! with citing a reference From Cleveland Clinic Journal of MedicineWhen it comes to angioplasty and stent, “true informed consent is rarely.”
It is no wonder among about 1,000 patients Survey In ten American academic and community hospitals, only 1 percent of the truth knew. Remarkable, some Shortcoming Patients said for their ignorance that the patients are those who usually lower or wrong the benefits of treatment, such as those who believe that the subcutaneous chemotherapy provides the ability to treat – ‘Medical misconceptions. “
“Why are there so many patients Happen With the benefits that they think bad? Do not see patients to find out why. Instead, check the inspiration of the doctor … Patients feel that they are doing life-saving procedures because medical professionals want them to believe that it is so. “Now, it’s not like those 95 percent cardiologist To lie This will reduce their risk by their patients and by saying; They leave only those details easily. But “[i]n in contrast, absence of information for most patients and some doctors Suppose She is a PCI life saving and biased to choose it. As a result, patients are rarely able to give the right informed consent to pass through PCI. ,
Why would they believe this? Because many Pass A wild concept of “personal care ‘-that a physician’s of RST responsibility is completely for the patient’s good,” but is it not innocent? “In the absence of information, or even when presented with the contrast evidence, patients believe that the treatments introduced will be Bene Cial.”
This is true, even if you clearly Tell Stent that does not reduce the risk of heart attack to patients. You can cut that misconception in half “with a relatively low effort – as 2 rows of text,” to remove myths in many people. But many participants continued to believe that angioplasty and stent prevent heart attacks, even when clearly stated that they do not do and give a detailed description of why they do not. After all, why would doctors be Push If they do not help them? This is a good question, which we will address further.
