Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

Sunday, 29 June 2025
Politics

International law ‘at heart’ of Starmer’s foreign policy, says attorney general

International law ‘at heart’ of Starmer’s foreign policy, says attorney general

The Attorney General has told the BBC that a commitment to the Sir Kir Stmper’s government and the international law of its approach to the foreign policy is “fully for the heart”.

In his first broadcasting interview, Lord Richard Hermer, who is the Cabinet’s Chief Legal Advisor, stated that the government was firm to “lead on international law issues” globally.

He argued that it has enabled the UK to attack economic deals with the US, India and the European Union in recent months.

The Attorney General also defended the decision of the stormer to seek a “hot” relationship with President Trump at the cost of “short -term political gains”.

Lord Hermer’s comments, who came in a fully extended interview for an upcoming BBC Radio 4 Program Stamor Storm YearWas built earlier Recent speculation about his legal advice About the government’s approach to the conflict between Israel and Iran.

Nevertheless, they help illustrate the approach being taken by one of the most powerful figures in the government, as the minister navigates a dangerous diplomatic moment.

On Monday, The government refused to say again and again Did it believe that America’s attacks on Iran were legal, arguing that it was not a question to assess the British ministers.

The Prime Minister’s approach to the law taken by Hermer, an old friend of the Prime Minister, who had no political profile before his amazing appointment about a year ago, has had a frequent controversy in Stramemer’s Premiership.

Asked if the international law was a “red line” for the Prime Minister in foreign policy, Hermer replied: “If you ask me what is the main overriding interest of Keer, it is really to improve life for the people of this country.”

He continued: “Is international law important for this government and this Prime Minister? Of course.

“This is important in itself, but it is also important because it goes to the heart completely to what we are trying to achieve, which is to improve life for people in this country.

“And so I am completely convinced, and I think the government is completely united on it, by really ensuring that we are following the law of all forms – domestic laws and international laws – we serve the national interest.”

Hermer said: “Look, we have entered trade deals only with the United States, with India, with the European Union, and we are able to do so because we have returned to the stage of the world as a country whose word is their bond.

“Nobody wants to deal with people whom they do not trust. Nobody wants to sign international agreements with a country that is a government that is saying, well, ‘We can follow it, we cannot do it’.

“We do. We are successful. We secure business deals that are necessary to improve people’s lives in this country.

“We secure deals on migration with Iraq, with Germany, with Germany, which are going to deal with some other fundamental problems facing us, and we can do so because we follow, and we really comply on issues of international law and really lead.

“As a good faith player in international law, it is heavy in the national interests of this country.”

Speaking more about the UK relations with the US, Hermer said: “This is a relationship that will not doubt different points, involves various various pressures, but it is absolutely important to us.

“I think the approach taken by Keer has never to give the kind of love that is actually a instinct for short -term political gains, rather to ensure that our relationship with the United States is warm, the channels of communication are always open, that we have mutual honor.

“I think this country is heavy in the interests.”

In fact, in the 2003 film Love, a fictional Prime Minister opposed the US President during a press conference.

Earlier this year, Hermer said that he Repel on “clumsy” comment In which he compared the calls for the UK to depart from international laws and arguments in Germany of the 1930s.

In a speech, he criticized politicians who argued that Britain should leave “obstacles of international law in favor of raw power”, saying that similar claims were made by legal theorists in Germany before Nazis came to power.

Some conservative and reforms UK has called the UK to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (Echr).

Source link

Anuragbagde69@gmail.com

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay updated with the latest trending news, insights, and top stories. Get the breaking news and in-depth coverage from around the world!

Get Latest Updates and big deals

    Our expertise, as well as our passion for web design, sets us apart from other agencies.