Unlock the editor’s digestion for free

FT editor Rula Khalf, selects his favorite stories in this weekly newspaper.

Observers can be forgiven for thinking that the financial markets do not care much about geo -political shock. The world’s largest economy is threatening to place itself behind a tariff wall. War Rage in Europe. And a fresh Middle East conflict has been broken since 13 June. Nevertheless, the S&P500 records with a record high. This week also it has become flexible as the US considered Iran involving Israeli’s war. Brent crude prices are up, but for only one $ 77 per barrel. Has investors lost touch with reality? The historical market for global events does not take a look at the reactions.

Using data returning in World War II, Deutch bank found that on average, S&P 500 falls to about 6 percent in three weeks. Geophagical The shock, only three weeks later to recover completely. In other words, if history is a guide, it is still time for the market response to Israel-Iran’s struggle.

Each shock also appears in different ways. In 1939, Adolf Hitler’s Annexation triggered an accident of 20 percent in the main American equity index. It took it out for more than a month. The 9/11 attacks sold more than 10 percent in just six days to recover in three weeks. The 1973 oil ambargo created a inflation crisis by Arab countries after the Yom Kipping War, from which it took years to recover the developed markets. Europe’s high dependence on Russian gas meant that in February 2022, Vladimir Putin was disrupted its industries by a long -term cost after attacking Ukraine. The DAX index of Germany continued the trend downwards till October that year.

What can we learn from these incidents? Market reaction Usually comes in two parts. First, the confidence of the shock buffetts investor, preventing a flight for safety. Second, depending on the economic importance and perseverance of the event, it eventually leaks into earnings, investment plans, prices and jobs, which then takes traders to the price in a changed economic perspective.

Right now, facing both tariffs and the Middle East shock, investors are trying to find out their impacts on the real economy. Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” duties triggered by duties were closed only by 90-day stagnation in their enforcement. This time limit is on 8 July, what happens next, with little clarity on it.

For Israel-Iran war, more restrained immediate response, relative to the least historical energy shock, makes sense. Oil is less important in giving strength to the global economy than in the 1970s. The supply is also less concentrated. Iran’s oil exports are less than 2 percent of the global demand, and in 2020, the US became an annual net exporter of the total petroleum for the first time since 1949.

This has focused the minds of investors on what the crisis matters the most to the global economy. The greatest risk is an increase, possibly entering the US struggle, which leads to closure of Hermuz’s Strait, through which the fifth of the world’s daily oil consumption flows. If so, analysts said that the oil could push above $ 120 per barrel. A shock of a temporary value can turn into more continuous inflation, with a knock-on implication for central banks.

It looks at the development on both the traders on both tariffs and the Middle East War, reproducing the possibilities for the worst situation in real time. Only when uncertainty is cleared, investors can properly assure their forecasts for economic basic things, which outlines the asset evaluation. For now, however, 9 July is a large unknown. And, although President Trump appeared on Thursday allowing time to negotiate with Iran, as he earlier warned, “Nobody knows what I am going to do”. Despite the recent appearances, the geopolitics matters to the markets – as it affects the real economy. Today, relatives can prove to be calm before the storm.