Former India cricketer and head coach Ravi Shastri The International Cricket Council has defended the decision to allocate India 38.5 percent of its total revenue for the 2024-27 cycle, stating that it is appropriate in view of India’s contribution to the global revenue of cricket. The Control Board for Cricket in India (BCCI) is almost Rs. 1,968 crores annually, which is 6.89 percent of England and Wales Cricket Board and six times the 6.25 percent stake in Cricket Australia.The Revenue Distribution Model announced in 2023 has discussed in the cricket world, in which some boards have expressed concern about the allocation of ratio. The remaining 12 percent of revenue is distributed among nine other cricket-playing countries.Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!Shastri has emphasized that revenue stake should be proportional to income generated income, stating that India contributes significantly to the global income of cricket through television rights and chain revenue.
“I would like more for India because the money that has been generated comes from India. So it is only appropriate that they get their own share of meat pounds. It is relative, it is relative, it is economies, if another economy can be there tomorrow, it is strong. Money can come from there as it was done in the 70s, and it is still correct to see that it is still correct. Therefore it is only appropriate that they get. Whatever they are getting now, if not more, “Shastri said in an interview Wisden,The distribution model has faced criticism from other cricket boards, especially outside the Big Three – India, England and Australia. These boards argue that the current model may disrupt the growth of cricket in other countries.Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has been particularly vocal against the revenue distribution model. He has demanded more transparency as to how the allocation figures were determined.“We are insisting that the ICC should tell how these figures came. We are not happy with the situation because we are standing because it stands.”
