What do doctors and stent companies have to say to themselves, given that they promote expensive, risky processes without any profit?
“Perkutanese Coronary Intervention (PCI)” – Angioplasty and Stent Placement – “Often continues Performed For patients with stable [non-emergency] Coronary artery disease, despite clear evidence that it provides minimal bene… t… ”The process does not prevent heart attack or death for patients with stable angina pectoris, for example, yet about nine of the ten patients in the wrong way is still incorrectly incorrectly. It is believed that This will reduce their chances of heart attack. “At the same time, cardiologists who referred to him to PCI and those who process it usually did not believe that PCI reduces the risk for MI [myocardial infarction or heart attack] In stable angina. “Then why were they doing this on earth?”
“Cardiologists have focus groups Document A chess between knowledge and behavior; While the results of clinical trials are known, “this is, the contrast is evidence-” they recommend and perform PCI because they believe that it helps in some sick-day fi NED way. ” “doctor Trend To justify a non-evidence-based approach (‘I know the data shows that there is no benefit, but’) ‘) Focusing on the ease of PCI and belief that an open artery was better “-if it really does not affect the results-” reduce the risks of PCI. “This process only kills 1 in 150, so some patients are blaming for listening, but perhaps the physicians are those who are ignoring the evidence.
Or may be the doctor Pass Very poor of relevant data to inform your patients adequately. Despite this, whatever we have “failure to communicate”. So, there are equipment advancedFor example, a sample reported consent documents meet potential benefits and risks, even suggests how many procedures doctors have performed and any out-off-pocket costs. As you can see below and in my video at 1:58 Angioplasty Heart Stent Risk vs. BenefitsThere are many spaces to be full In, what are some solid numbers?
As you can see below and at 2:20 in me VideoMayo Clinic Came With some prototype decision making equipment. In terms of benefits, “Will a stent be placed in my heart will prevent heart attack or death? No. Stent will not reduce the risk of heart attack or death,” but a week later the stent reports feel better-although, even after a year, even the symptomatic-rich profit disappears. Nevertheless, temporary relief of chest pain benefited. What about risks?
As shown below and at 2:53 in me VideoDuring the stent process, two of the hundred people, two will do Pass Bleeding or damage to the blood vessel will be more severe complication, such as heart attack, stroke, or death. Then, during the first year after stent placement, three will have a occurrence of bleeding due to thinning of blood, which should be taken due to foreign material in the heart, but it does not always work, so two people will close their stent clogs, causing a heart attack.
What do the world’s number one stent manufacturer has to say for himself? it Believes This evidence suggests that stents do not make people alive for a long time, but the manufacturer thinks that it is more longer to live long. If we only care about staying in medicine for a long time, “the whole subjects will decrease or disappear, such as dermatology, ophthalmology, orthopedic surgery and dentistry.” So why go to the dentist? Of course, the difference is that 80 percent are not people faith That a cavity is full, is going to save their lives, as they accidentally do for the stent, as shown here and in me at 3:18 VideoAnd there is not one in a hundred chance you will not out of the chair.
Stent companies actively misunderstand with advertisements that make up heart heating copies. ,open Your heart and your life. “” When you open Above your heart, you open your life. Life is wide open. ” “Freedom Starts Here. “His TV advertisements mention some side effects, but it turns out Missed Some. More importantly, they are giving false assumptions that the stents for temporary symptoms are more than expensive, risky band-aids. But what is wrong with symptoms relief? Even if there is profit Are Only symptomatic and long will not last long, if people wonder that it is ahead of risk then what is the problem?
What if I told you that symptoms relief It is possible Just have a wide placebo effect, and you Be able to Get the same relief from a fake surgery, so there is really no benefit? We will see what science says – Answer.
