Coca-Cola still had a cloying appreciation for the unsafe switch, in fact, was not announced, submerged with some cold reality from Coca-Cola. Continuing not to confirm the agreement, the soda manufacturer seemed to respond to the “artificial” bit in Fox’s post, saying that HFCS “is just a sweetener made from corn. It’s safe; it is about the calories per serving per serving and is metabollassed by your body in the same way.”

The beverage manufacturer also stated that the American Medical Association “confirmed that HFCS table is not more likely to contribute to obesity than sugar or other full-calorie sweetness.”

A 2008 report from AMA Concluded that “because the structure of HFC and Sucrose is so similar, especially on the absorption by the body, it is not possible that HFC contributes more to obesity or other conditions than the sucrose.” However, the Medical Association referred to the lack of direct research compared to sweetness.

While political critics suggest that the fizzle cocal nuisance is just one distraction from the President’s ongoing Epstein File Scam, health experts are shaking their heads.

Nutritionist Marion Nestle, Professor Emeritus at New York University, Told State News Push to cane sugar, like pushing to remove artificial colors from processed foods, was “nourishing with nutrition”. Is the coke sweet with sugarcane sugar or HFC, it still equals about 10 teaspoons of sugar per 12-inges and has a risk for conditions such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease. Nestle said, “This is the kind of thing that rolls their eyes to nutritionist, because it doesn’t matter.”