International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head Rafael Gossi stated that US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites would have caused “significant physical damage”, but it would be “much more” to say that their nuclear program has been “erased”.Centrifuse, which are spinning machines used to enrich uranium, require high-degree of accuracy and are unsafe for acute vibrations, the New York Times cited groasies. He said, “There was no one to avoid significant physical damage,” he said, “So we can come to a fairly accurate technical conclusion.”

He was quoted, saying that it would be an exaggeration to claim that Iran’s nuclear program was completely “erased” by Israel and US air strikes, with the claims of US President Donald Trump that it was “slant”. Groxy reported that many nuclear facilities remained untouched and Iranian officials had informed them about the plan to implement “protective measures” for their existing stockpiles of rich uranium.In addition, speaking to a French radio station, he said that the US “reduced Iran’s nuclear capabilities” but “” It would be very difficult for Iran to continue at the same speed as before. “These comments come because the effectiveness of the US attacks came under the report, claiming that Iran had shifted a uranium stock pile from nuclear sites before the attack.However, the US has dismissed such claims with Trump, saying, “Car and small trucks on the site were working for concrete, trying to cover the top of the shaft. Nothing was taken out of the facility. It would be too long, very dangerous and very heavy and difficult to move!”