Repeatedly, studies have shown that doctors make clinical decisions for patients how much they will pay themselves.

In 2007, we Learned Adventure tests that angioplasty and stent -percutanese coronary intervention (PCI) – do not reduce the risk of death or heart attack, but patients did not think to get Memo. Only 1 percent realized that there was no mortality or heart attack benefit, probably because most cardiologists fail To mention that fact. One can imagine if the patient really really really understood This symptomatic relief was all that they were going to receive, “no additional mortality rate benefits”, they would be less likely to go under the knife. Then, ten years later, the orbita test was PublishedAlso showing Promise Symptoms relief was an illusion.

“Orbita’s implications Are Dark and far -reaching. First and most important, orbita results show unevenly that there are no benefits for PCI compared to medical therapy for stable angina, ie, heart disease. Basically, there will be patients. Threatening “Disadvantages without any benefit. It is difficult to imagine a landscape where a fully informed patient will choose an additional aggressive treatment without any additional benefit.” Stent Consent Form I Remember Discussed First, my video is shown down and at 1:17 If they do not work then why is the stent still used?,

Now this Looks like In this way, it was seen down and at 1:21.

so, Is Orbita trial “Last nail in the coffin for PCI in stable angina?” That is, for stent in non-fruit-term situations? A editorial in the journal Cardiopia DisagreePointing to “broad angina relief in both arms”. In other words, Stent helped – even though the Sham Operation without a stent helped just as much. So, “If the patient is treated with PCI and is benefiting from the ‘Placebo Effect’, then I am who to intervene with that Bene the T of this ‘therapy’?” In that case, why not do fake surgery? Stent placement Be able to do About $ 40,000 cost. All this fake will all be cheaper. We should not do the reason Keep Election people have to do stenting because there is a body count. During stent placement, 2 percent patients develop Bleeding or blood vessel damage, while another 1 percent dies or a heart attack or stroke. And because something is stuck in your chest, 3 percent of patients have a occurrence of bleeding from thin blood that should be taken. Or blood thinners do not work and stent clots stop and have a heart attack.

Why are they even when we have proof not only the benefit, but in many cases, we Pass Clear “proof of any profit”? One of the sources of resistance can be all financial benefits. These procedures Make A lot of money for hospitals. Do not expect them to “change lifestyle to combat heart disease. Is it so easy? Is This famous Apon Sinklair quotes: “It is difficult for a man to understand something when his salary depends on him to understand.” Looks like just a blank? Let’s ask the doctors themselves.

There were thousands of doctors SurveyAnd 70 percent of “believed that doctors provide unnecessary procedures when they benefit from them.” This doctor himself believes. And data Bear It out. Doctors have been shown to make clinical decisions for patients how much they are paid. For example, when selection of To treat breast cancer, increasing chemotherapy, increasing the difference of a physician by 10 percent can lead to an increase of 177 percent in the possibility of choosing a drug.

This is why Caesarean section is more likely to be ” Performed By profit-profit hospitals compared to non-profit hospitals. ,Operating On commission. Pay the process per process, and you can increase the rate of surgery by 78 percent. to do 101 percent more angioplasty than any other rich country? A study on “Financial incentives’ financial incentives and treatment options in heart attack management” found that they actually react positively to pay obtained payments and reaction is quite large … unconditional, plans that are associated with more aggressive treatment for more aggressive remedies for more aggressive remedies, “there is to result in more aggressive remedies. Therefore, it can actually be quite common for patients to receive different treatment, whether the doctor is being paid per procedure.

One of my heroes, Dr. Caldwell Esselstin – Which always tries to To see the best in people – to accept that compensation can play a role. Proof Front “Doctors have raced millions of dollars in the medical bill by imposing unnecessary stent,” doctors like Mark Made Pouring 30 stents in a single day. This can be worth about one million dollars of billing. As a token of gratitude, a sales representative of the stent company Dr. For a barbecue dinner in Midai’s house, “spent more than $ 2,000 to buy a whole slow smoked pig, peach cobbler, and other fixing.”

“America is only about one developed country where there is health care Delivered On the basis of fee-per-service and we very generously encourage physicians for aggressive procedures, “the head of cardiac in Cleveland Clinic said.” Economic incentives are still very strong. ,